Apple Mac Upgrades - RAM, SSD Flash, External Drives and More

Star Wars: Jedi Knight II	L2 Cache	L3 Cache	FPS

Reference Apple Systems

PM G4/350 AGP Graphics (Sawtooth)	1MB SPB SRAM	0MB	16.4
PM G4/400 Gigabit Ethernet	1MB SPB SRAM	0MB	19.2
PM G4/450 Gigabit Ethernet	1MB SPB SRAM	0MB	19.2
PM G4/500 AGP Graphics (Sawtooth)	1MB SPB SRAM	0MB	22.9
PM 2x G4/450 Gigabit Ethernet	1MB SPB SRAM x2	0MB	26.5
eMac G4/700MHz	256k On Chip	0MB	6.5

Acceleration Cards

GigaDesigns G4/800MHz	256k On Chip	2MB SPB SRAM	28.5
OWC Mercury Extreme G4/800MHz	256k On Chip	2MB SPB SRAM	28.6
PowerLogix PowerForce S233 G4/800MHz	256k On Chip	2MB SPB SRAM	28.5
Sonnet Encore/ST G4/800MHz	256k On Chip	2MB DDR SRAM	28.6
GigaDesigns G4/1GHz	256k On Chip	2MB SPB SRAM	31.5
PowerLogix PowerForce S233 G4/1.0GHz	256k On Chip	2MB SPB SRAM	31.4
Sonnet Encore/ST G4/1GHz	256k On Chip	2MB DDR SRAM	33.9
PowerLogix PowerForce S233 G4/1.2GHz	256k On Chip	2MB SPB SRAM	35.7
Sonnet Encore/ST G4/1.2GHz	256k On Chip	2MB DDR SRAM	36.4
GigaDesigns G4/1.25GHz	256k On Chip	2MB DDR SRAM	35.4
OWC Mercury Extreme G4/1.25GHz	256k On Chip	2MB DDR SRAM	37.1
OWC Mercury Extreme G4/1.3GHz	256k On Chip	2MB DDR SRAM	37.4
GigaDesigns G4/1.4GHz	256k On Chip	2MB DDR SRAM	39.5
OWC Mercury Extreme G4/1.4GHz	256k On Chip	2MB DDR SRAM	39.6
PowerLogix PowerForce 2x900MHz	256k On Chip x2	2MB SPB SRAM x2	36.8
PowerLogix PowerForce 2x1.0GHz	256k On Chip x2	2MB SPB SRAM x2	37.4
PowerLogix PowerForce 2x1.2GHz (@ 1.3GHz)	256k On Chip x2	2MB SPB SRAM x2	42.3

Star Wars: Jedi Knight II - Jedi Outcast. Average frames per second, longer bars are better. What more can I say about this game other than "WOW"! It's one of the most visually pleasing games I have ever played, the first time I saw it at MacWorld NY in July I knew it would be a killer on graphics cards & system performance. First impressions were right, it's by far the most demanding game I have ever played on my system - and it's worth upgrading to play. Check out this great review of Jedi Knight II from Apple - with screenshots! All tests were performed using the default "high quality" settings, no config file trickery or any unusual enhancements were performed generating these scores. Standard TimeDemo routines used.